MTG MasterMTG Master

Myrel

Summary

This is a strong, cohesive Myrel Soldiers/tokens deck with real Bracket 4 traits: fast mana, premium protection, efficient tutors, and a commander that naturally suppresses interaction on your turn. It goldfishes well and punishes creaturecentric pods. The structural issue is that most wins are still combatdependent board snowball lines, while the stack interaction and deterministic finishing power are lighter than typical upperend Bracket 4 decks.

Commander

Myrel, Shield of Argive

Deck Verdict

Bracket-Legal but Meta-Fragile - Bracket 4 - General Power 7.8 - Score in bracket 4.3 - Confidence: high

Commander background

Myrel

Bracket 4
T
Taco
Commander: Myrel, Shield of ArgiveCommander
Deck description
Share the deck goals, win lines, or table etiquette…
Deck total
$3,596.98
Missing cost
-
Wishboard
-
Deck cards
100
4.3/10
Score in bracket
7.8/10
General Power
SpeResConIntSynRelative Power
MTG Master

Commander (1)

  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer

Planeswalkers (2)

  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer

Creatures (26)

  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {W}
    TCGPlayer

Sorceries (3)

  • 1
    {2}{W}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer

Instants (13)

  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Game Changer
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer

Artifacts (13)

  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Game Changer
    {0}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {5}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1FoilGame Changer
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer

Enchantments (6)

  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {X}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}
    TCGPlayer

Lands (35)

  • 1Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Game Changer
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 24Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Other (1)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Mana curve

Mana value distribution and average cost for castable cards in the main deck.

65 castable cards35 pure lands excluded
Cards by mana value
Nonlands plus spell-side lands, grouped by rounded mana value.
1
Mana value 0: 1 cards
0
17
Mana value 1: 17 cards
1
21
Mana value 2: 21 cards
2
12
Mana value 3: 12 cards
3
7
Mana value 4: 7 cards
4
7
Mana value 5: 7 cards
5
Mana value 6: 0 cards
6
Mana value 7: 0 cards
7
8+ mana value: 0 cards
8+
Mana valueCounted cards
Average mana value
Based on nonlands and double-faced lands with a spell side.
2.43
Average MV
Lean1.2-2.5
Balanced2.5-3.5
Heavy3.5-5.0
Average
2.43
Median
2
Total MV
158
Counted
65

Mana pressure & alignment

How your colored demand lines up with the mana base during your game.

Color pressure

Demand vs support share by color.

{W}White
Aligned
Demand: 100%Support: 88%
{C}Colorless
Surplus
Demand: 0%Support: 12%
{W}Delta-0.0Aligned
{C}Delta+4.5Surplus

Mana integrity

Overall alignment score for your mana base.

100Score
Grade
Excellent
Highlights
  • Mana integrity looks excellent.
  • Colorless has extra support compared to demand.

Early turn stress

Where colored and colorless mana requirements cluster across turns.

White
Weighted colored and colorless pips
Demand score
19.5score
Turn 1: Demand score 19.5Turn 1
24.9score
Turn 2: Demand score 24.9Turn 2
14.3score
Turn 3: Demand score 14.3Turn 3
9.7score
Turn 4: Demand score 9.7Turn 4
13.8score
Turn 5: Demand score 13.8Turn 5
No demand
Turn 6: Demand score 0Turn 6
No demand
Turn 7+: Demand score 0Turn 7+

Mana Base

Benchmark-backed view of how the deck develops mana, fixes colors, and reaches commander timing in the first turns.

high
Main bottleneck: 3 mana by turn 3 via Short on mana

Mana readiness snapshot

Compact early-game checks for whether the mana base turns on cleanly.

Turn 1 live color
Live colored mana for turn-1 plays.
97%
2 mana by turn 2
Keeps the early curve on schedule.
100%
Commander color by turn 3
Gets the key commander color online early.
100%
Double pip by turn 3
Checks early UU, BB, RR, or GG requirements.
99%
Benchmark target: Champions from Beyond
Higher percentages mean the mana base supports the deck's early asks more consistently.

Commander and color timing

Shows when the mana base turns colors on and when commander timing becomes reliable.

  • All colors online
  • Commander castable
T3T4T5T60255075100
Main bottlenecks

Benchmarks that miss most often, plus the dominant reasons behind those misses.

5% Main bottleneck: 3 mana by turn 3 via Short on mana
Short on mana: 100%No early ramp: 40%
Want the full opener diagnosis?

Open the full analysis for mulligans, risky openers, benchmark miss causes, and the complete why-hands-fail breakdown.

Comments

0 comments

Log in to comment
Be the first to comment.