MTG MasterMTG Master

Betor the Beast

Summary

General Power 6.6/10 — a tuned Abzan midrange deck with real card advantage, premium removal, recursion, and multiple snowball finishers. Score in Bracket 8.7/10 — this sits well above a normal Bracket 2 table and plays more like a solid Bracket 3 deck. The list is cohesive and strong, but its staple quality and inevitability profile overshoot typical preconplus expectations.

Commander

Betor, Ancestor's Voice

Deck Verdict

Mismatched for Declared Bracket - Bracket 2 - General Power 6.6 - Score in bracket 8.7 - Confidence: high

Commander background

Betor the Beast

Bracket 2
P
Play44503328
Commander: Betor, Ancestor's VoiceCommander
Deck description
Share the deck goals, win lines, or table etiquette…
Deck total
$1,471.70
Missing cost
-
Wishboard
-
Deck cards
100
8.7/10
Score in bracket
6.6/10
General Power
SpeResConIntSynRelative Power
MTG Master

Commander (1)

  • 1
    {2}{W}{B}{G}
    TCGPlayer

Planeswalkers (1)

  • 1Foil
    {2}{W}{B}
    TCGPlayer

Creatures (28)

  • 1Foil
    {2}{G}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {4}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{G}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{G}
    TCGPlayer

Sorceries (5)

  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer

Instants (9)

  • 1
    {3}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{W}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {W}
    TCGPlayer

Artifacts (9)

  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}{2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {7}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}
    TCGPlayer

Enchantments (9)

  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{W}{W}{W}
    TCGPlayer

Lands (38)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 6
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 8Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 6
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Mana curve

Mana value distribution and average cost for castable cards in the main deck.

62 castable cards38 pure lands excluded
Cards by mana value
Nonlands plus spell-side lands, grouped by rounded mana value.
Mana value 0: 0 cards
0
12
Mana value 1: 12 cards
1
5
Mana value 2: 5 cards
2
16
Mana value 3: 16 cards
3
17
Mana value 4: 17 cards
4
7
Mana value 5: 7 cards
5
3
Mana value 6: 3 cards
6
1
Mana value 7: 1 cards
7
1
8+ mana value: 1 cards
8+
Mana valueCounted cards
Average mana value
Based on nonlands and double-faced lands with a spell side.
3.34
Average MV
Lean1.2-2.5
Balanced2.5-3.5
Heavy3.5-5.0
Average
3.34
Median
3
Total MV
207
Counted
62

Mana pressure & alignment

How your colored demand lines up with the mana base during your game.

Color pressure

Demand vs support share by color.

{W}White
Aligned
Demand: 38%Support: 37%
{B}Black
Aligned
Demand: 31%Support: 27%
{G}Green
Aligned
Demand: 32%Support: 32%
{C}Colorless
Surplus
Demand: 0%Support: 4%
{B}Delta-1.0Aligned
{W}Delta+0.3Aligned
{G}Delta+0.7Aligned
{C}Delta+1.5Surplus

Mana integrity

Overall alignment score for your mana base.

100Score
Grade
Excellent
Highlights
  • Mana integrity looks excellent.
  • Colorless has extra support compared to demand.

Early turn stress

Where colored and colorless mana requirements cluster across turns.

White
Black
Green
Weighted colored and colorless pips
Demand score
15score
Turn 1: Demand score 15Turn 1
9score
Turn 2: Demand score 9Turn 2
26score
Turn 3: Demand score 26Turn 3
34.8score
Turn 4: Demand score 34.8Turn 4
13.2score
Turn 5: Demand score 13.2Turn 5
7score
Turn 6: Demand score 7Turn 6
4.1score
Turn 7+: Demand score 4.1Turn 7+

Mana Base

Benchmark-backed view of how the deck develops mana, fixes colors, and reaches commander timing in the first turns.

medium
Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip

Mana readiness snapshot

Compact early-game checks for whether the mana base turns on cleanly.

Turn 1 live color
Live colored mana for turn-1 plays.
79%
2 mana by turn 2
Keeps the early curve on schedule.
98%
All colors by turn 3
Gets the full color mix online early.
87%
Double pip by turn 3
Checks early UU, BB, RR, or GG requirements.
58%
Benchmark target: Damn
Higher percentages mean the mana base supports the deck's early asks more consistently.

Commander and color timing

Shows when the mana base turns colors on and when commander timing becomes reliable.

  • All colors online
  • Commander castable
T3T4T5T60255075100
Main bottlenecks

Benchmarks that miss most often, plus the dominant reasons behind those misses.

42% Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip
Tracking Damn as the early double-pip test.Missing second pip: 100%Tapped-land tempo: 17%
Want the full opener diagnosis?

Open the full analysis for mulligans, risky openers, benchmark miss causes, and the complete why-hands-fail breakdown.

Comments

0 comments

Log in to comment
Be the first to comment.