MTG MasterMTG Master

New Deck

Summary

This is a cohesive Simic Frog ETB/bounce deck with strong card advantage, solid creaturebased acceleration, and several highceiling loop engines. Its Bracket 4 problem is conversion: interaction is materially below optimizedpod expectations, tutors are light, and its most explosive combo infrastructure relies on expensive or disruptionsensitive pieces such as Intruder Alarm and Hullbreaker Horror. It will play powerful value games, but it is not consistently equipped for T68 optimized tables.

Commander

Clement, the Worrywort

Deck Verdict

Mismatched for Declared Bracket - Bracket 4 - General Power 7.1 - Score in bracket 2.0 - Confidence: High

Commander background

New Deck

Bracket 4
W
Witness-seeks123
Commander: Clement, the WorrywortCommander
Deck description
Share the deck goals, win lines, or table etiquette…
Deck total
$212.37
Missing cost
-
Wishboard
-
Deck cards
100
2/10
Score in bracket
7.1/10
General Power
SpeResConIntSynRelative Power
MTG Master

Commander (1)

  • 1Foil
    {1}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer

Creatures (32)

  • 1
    {2}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {3}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {5}{U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {2}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G/U}{G/U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {8}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer

Sorceries (11)

  • 1
    {1}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer

Instants (12)

  • 1
    {U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer

Artifacts (3)

  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer

Enchantments (7)

  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer

Lands (34)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 12
    TCGPlayer
  • 12
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Mana curve

Mana value distribution and average cost for castable cards in the main deck.

66 castable cards34 pure lands excluded
Cards by mana value
Nonlands plus spell-side lands, grouped by rounded mana value.
Mana value 0: 0 cards
0
13
Mana value 1: 13 cards
1
16
Mana value 2: 16 cards
2
18
Mana value 3: 18 cards
3
11
Mana value 4: 11 cards
4
5
Mana value 5: 5 cards
5
1
Mana value 6: 1 cards
6
1
Mana value 7: 1 cards
7
1
8+ mana value: 1 cards
8+
Mana valueCounted cards
Average mana value
Based on nonlands and double-faced lands with a spell side.
2.86
Average MV
Lean1.2-2.5
Balanced2.5-3.5
Heavy3.5-5.0
Average
2.86
Median
3
Total MV
189
Counted
66

Mana pressure & alignment

How your colored demand lines up with the mana base during your game.

Color pressure

Demand vs support share by color.

{U}Blue
Aligned
Demand: 48%Support: 46%
{G}Green
Aligned
Demand: 52%Support: 46%
{C}Colorless
Surplus
Demand: 0%Support: 7%
{G}Delta-0.5Aligned
{U}Delta+0.5Aligned
{C}Delta+2.9Surplus

Mana integrity

Overall alignment score for your mana base.

100Score
Grade
Excellent
Highlights
  • Mana integrity looks excellent.
  • Colorless has extra support compared to demand.

Early turn stress

Where colored and colorless mana requirements cluster across turns.

Blue
Green
Weighted colored and colorless pips
Demand score
18score
Turn 1: Demand score 18Turn 1
27.7score
Turn 2: Demand score 27.7Turn 2
29.8score
Turn 3: Demand score 29.8Turn 3
20.5score
Turn 4: Demand score 20.5Turn 4
9.8score
Turn 5: Demand score 9.8Turn 5
2.2score
Turn 6: Demand score 2.2Turn 6
2score
Turn 7+: Demand score 2Turn 7+

Mana Base

Benchmark-backed view of how the deck develops mana, fixes colors, and reaches commander timing in the first turns.

high
Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip

Mana readiness snapshot

Compact early-game checks for whether the mana base turns on cleanly.

Turn 1 live color
Live colored mana for turn-1 plays.
70%
2 mana by turn 2
Keeps the early curve on schedule.
98%
All colors by turn 3
Gets the full color mix online early.
90%
Double pip by turn 3
Checks early UU, BB, RR, or GG requirements.
68%
Benchmark target: Counterspell
Higher percentages mean the mana base supports the deck's early asks more consistently.

Commander and color timing

Shows when the mana base turns colors on and when commander timing becomes reliable.

  • All colors online
  • Commander castable
T3T4T5T60255075100
Main bottlenecks

Benchmarks that miss most often, plus the dominant reasons behind those misses.

32% Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip
Tracking Counterspell as the early double-pip test.Missing second pip: 100%Tapped-land tempo: 19%
Want the full opener diagnosis?

Open the full analysis for mulligans, risky openers, benchmark miss causes, and the complete why-hands-fail breakdown.

Comments

0 comments

Log in to comment
Be the first to comment.