MTG MasterMTG Master

Sephirot

Summary

This Sephiroth monoblack aristocrats/sacrifice list is well above Bracket 3 in interaction density and combo potential (Gravecrawler loops, altar engines, multiple real tutors), but the submitted decklist is structurally invalid/incomplete at 93 cards and is also light on protection for its key engines. Aspresented, it cannot be reliably bracketed or played without fixes.

Commander

Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER // Sephiroth, One-Winged Angel

Deck Verdict

Not Recommended Without Changes - Bracket 3 - General Power 7.4 - Score in bracket 8.8 - Confidence: High

Commander background

Sephirot

Bracket 3
P
Play13338741
Commander: Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER // Sephiroth, One-Winged AngelCommander
Deck description
Share the deck goals, win lines, or table etiquette…
Deck total
$892.47
Missing cost
-
Wishboard
-
Deck cards
100
8.8/10
Score in bracket
7.4/10
General Power
SpeResConIntSynRelative Power
MTG Master

Commander (1)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Creatures (33)

  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {3}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{B}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{B/P}{B/P}{B/P}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1FoilGame Changer
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer

Sorceries (9)

  • 1
    {2/B}{2/B}{2/B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer

Instants (12)

  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer

Artifacts (8)

  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1FoilGame Changer
    {3}{B}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer

Enchantments (5)

  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{B}{B}{B}
    TCGPlayer

Lands (32)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 27
    TCGPlayer

Mana curve

Mana value distribution and average cost for castable cards in the main deck.

68 castable cards32 pure lands excluded
Cards by mana value
Nonlands plus spell-side lands, grouped by rounded mana value.
Mana value 0: 0 cards
0
17
Mana value 1: 17 cards
1
21
Mana value 2: 21 cards
2
19
Mana value 3: 19 cards
3
5
Mana value 4: 5 cards
4
2
Mana value 5: 2 cards
5
2
Mana value 6: 2 cards
6
1
Mana value 7: 1 cards
7
1
8+ mana value: 1 cards
8+
Mana valueCounted cards
Average mana value
Based on nonlands and double-faced lands with a spell side.
2.54
Average MV
Lean1.2-2.5
Balanced2.5-3.5
Heavy3.5-5.0
Average
2.54
Median
2
Total MV
173
Counted
68

Mana pressure & alignment

How your colored demand lines up with the mana base during your game.

Color pressure

Demand vs support share by color.

{B}Black
Aligned
Demand: 100%Support: 97%
{C}Colorless
Surplus
Demand: 0%Support: 3%
{B}Delta+0.0Aligned
{C}Delta+0.8Surplus

Mana integrity

Overall alignment score for your mana base.

100Score
Grade
Excellent
Highlights
  • Mana integrity looks excellent.
  • Colorless has extra support compared to demand.

Early turn stress

Where colored and colorless mana requirements cluster across turns.

Black
Weighted colored and colorless pips
Demand score
19.5score
Turn 1: Demand score 19.5Turn 1
30.5score
Turn 2: Demand score 30.5Turn 2
27.5score
Turn 3: Demand score 27.5Turn 3
9.5score
Turn 4: Demand score 9.5Turn 4
3.4score
Turn 5: Demand score 3.4Turn 5
4.8score
Turn 6: Demand score 4.8Turn 6
5.4score
Turn 7+: Demand score 5.4Turn 7+

Mana Base

Benchmark-backed view of how the deck develops mana, fixes colors, and reaches commander timing in the first turns.

high
Main bottleneck: 3 mana by turn 3 via Short on mana

Mana readiness snapshot

Compact early-game checks for whether the mana base turns on cleanly.

Turn 1 live color
Live colored mana for turn-1 plays.
92%
2 mana by turn 2
Keeps the early curve on schedule.
98%
Commander color by turn 3
Gets the key commander color online early.
100%
Double pip by turn 3
Checks early UU, BB, RR, or GG requirements.
99%
Benchmark target: Bitterbloom Bearer
Higher percentages mean the mana base supports the deck's early asks more consistently.

Commander and color timing

Shows when the mana base turns colors on and when commander timing becomes reliable.

  • All colors online
  • Commander castable
T3T4T5T60255075100
Main bottlenecks

Benchmarks that miss most often, plus the dominant reasons behind those misses.

9% Main bottleneck: 3 mana by turn 3 via Short on mana
Short on mana: 100%Tapped-land tempo: 11%No early ramp: 11%
Want the full opener diagnosis?

Open the full analysis for mulligans, risky openers, benchmark miss causes, and the complete why-hands-fail breakdown.

Comments

0 comments

Log in to comment
Be the first to comment.