MTG MasterMTG Master

Temur Roar - Storm of the Unwritten

Summary

Slightly Upgraded Precon

Commander

Ureni of the Unwritten

Deck Verdict

Bracket 3 - General Power 6.1 - Score in bracket 3.7

Commander background

Temur Roar - Storm of the Unwritten

Bracket 3
Edlimir avatar
Edlimir
Commander: Ureni of the UnwrittenCommander
Deck description
Slightly Upgraded Precon
Deck total
$1,229.51
Missing cost
-
Wishboard
-
Deck cards
100
Deck changed since last evaluation
3.7/10
Score in bracket
6.1/10
General Power
SpeResConIntSynRelative Power
MTG Master

Commander (1)

  • 1Foil
    {4}{G}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer

Planeswalkers (1)

  • 1Foil
    {2}{G/U}
    TCGPlayer

Creatures (29)

  • 1
    {5}{R}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{R}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {14}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {G}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{R}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {G}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {5}{G}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{U}{2}{G}
    TCGPlayer

Sorceries (9)

  • 1
    {4}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {8}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Game Changer
    {2}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{G}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {X}{R}{R}
    TCGPlayer

Instants (4)

  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}
    TCGPlayer

Artifacts (10)

  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {6}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {0}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}
    TCGPlayer

Enchantments (9)

  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{R}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {2}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {3}{U}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {4}{U}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {1}{R}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    {1}{G}
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    {G}{U}{R}
    TCGPlayer

Lands (37)

  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 5
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 3
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 7
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1Foil
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer
  • 1
    TCGPlayer

Mana curve

Mana value distribution and average cost for castable cards in the main deck.

63 castable cards37 pure lands excluded
Cards by mana value
Nonlands plus spell-side lands, grouped by rounded mana value.
1
Mana value 0: 1 cards
0
4
Mana value 1: 4 cards
1
12
Mana value 2: 12 cards
2
16
Mana value 3: 16 cards
3
8
Mana value 4: 8 cards
4
8
Mana value 5: 8 cards
5
7
Mana value 6: 7 cards
6
4
Mana value 7: 4 cards
7
3
8+ mana value: 3 cards
8+
Mana valueCounted cards
Average mana value
Based on nonlands and double-faced lands with a spell side.
3.97
Average MV
Lean1.2-2.5
Balanced2.5-3.5
Heavy3.5-5.0
Average
3.97
Median
3
Total MV
250
Counted
63

Mana pressure & alignment

How your colored demand lines up with the mana base during your game.

Color pressure

Demand vs support share by color.

{U}Blue
Surplus
Demand: 16%Support: 22%
{R}Red
Strained
Demand: 54%Support: 36%
{G}Green
Aligned
Demand: 30%Support: 30%
{C}Colorless
Surplus
Demand: 0%Support: 12%
{R}Delta-4.6Strained
{G}Delta+1.3Aligned
{U}Delta+3.2Surplus
{C}Delta+4.7Surplus

Mana integrity

Overall alignment score for your mana base.

91Score
Grade
Excellent
Highlights
  • Mana integrity looks excellent.
  • Red sources are getting stretched by the demand.
Recommendations
  • Add fixing rocks to stabilize Red.

Early turn stress

Where colored and colorless mana requirements cluster across turns.

Blue
Red
Green
Weighted colored and colorless pips
Demand score
4.5score
Turn 1: Demand score 4.5Turn 1
13.7score
Turn 2: Demand score 13.7Turn 2
28.6score
Turn 3: Demand score 28.6Turn 3
19.1score
Turn 4: Demand score 19.1Turn 4
17score
Turn 5: Demand score 17Turn 5
12score
Turn 6: Demand score 12Turn 6
12.2score
Turn 7+: Demand score 12.2Turn 7+

Mana Base

Benchmark-backed view of how the deck develops mana, fixes colors, and reaches commander timing in the first turns.

medium
Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip

Mana readiness snapshot

Compact early-game checks for whether the mana base turns on cleanly.

Turn 1 live color
Live colored mana for turn-1 plays.
83%
2 mana by turn 2
Keeps the early curve on schedule.
100%
All colors by turn 3
Gets the full color mix online early.
93%
Double pip by turn 3
Checks early UU, BB, RR, or GG requirements.
66%
Benchmark target: Deceptive Frostkite
Higher percentages mean the mana base supports the deck's early asks more consistently.

Commander and color timing

Shows when the mana base turns colors on and when commander timing becomes reliable.

  • All colors online
  • Commander castable
T3T4T5T60255075100
Main bottlenecks

Benchmarks that miss most often, plus the dominant reasons behind those misses.

34% Main bottleneck: Double pip by turn 3 via Missing second pip
Tracking Deceptive Frostkite as the early double-pip test.Missing second pip: 100%Tapped-land tempo: 26%
Want the full opener diagnosis?

Open the full analysis for mulligans, risky openers, benchmark miss causes, and the complete why-hands-fail breakdown.

Comments

0 comments

Log in to comment
Be the first to comment.